The story which needs to be pushed until tax payer monies quit funding anti-religious "art". Here is an excerpt from Boswell's Column:
It's mind-boggling that the same people who so quickly screech at the first sign of a religion near a government building don't get the point that it should be equally wrong to have a sign of anti-religion in a government building.
And don’t they see the richest irony of them all? There is that which they find offensive – a creche with the Baby Jesus on government property, and that which they celebrate and defend as “art” – a sacrilegious defamation of Jesus Christ, crucified. If it's wrong to promote the Christian religion with tax dollars, isn’t it many times worse to trash the Christian religion with tax dollars?
Like the public broadcasters, the public gallery operators hunger to rise above the dreary, pedestrian tastes of those rubes in middle America who revere Jesus and aren’t captivated by the “creative resistance” of the gay artistic vanguard. They demand “equality” and “inclusion” for the gay lobby, but there is no inclusion for the rest of us when it comes to what art they will declare advances the cause of “justice.” Curators ought to be wise enough to know there are limits of government-funded art.
So the curator announced finally that he was pulling the video of ants walking over the crucifix. But he offered no apology. In fact, he insisted that contrary to allegations, this “art” was not “meant to offend.” That’s simply dishonest. Anyone with an IQ greater than that of a potato chip knows this was precisely what they intended. This to them is the Christmas spirit.
The truth is they are offended because people refuse to buy into the lust and decadence they want everyone else to accept, so they feel they have the right to mock the rest of the world and flaunt garbage and pornography as art and expect the average Joe to pay for it. Push back... just say no to the rape of America...
Yet we find elsewhere this story:
Why aren't the atheist finding time to speak up against porn in the Smutsonian? Priorities?
No comments:
Post a Comment