I want my Nativity scene back at the court house lawn, say what?

The story which needs to be pushed until tax payer monies quit funding anti-religious "art". Here is an excerpt from Boswell's Column:

It's mind-boggling that the same people who so quickly screech at the first sign of a religion near a government building don't get the point that it should be equally wrong to have a sign of anti-religion in a government building.

And don’t they see the richest irony of them all? There is that which they find offensive – a creche with the Baby Jesus on government property, and that which they celebrate and defend as “art” – a sacrilegious defamation of Jesus Christ, crucified. If it's wrong to promote the Christian religion with tax dollars, isn’t it many times worse to trash the Christian religion with tax dollars?

Like the public broadcasters, the public gallery operators hunger to rise above the dreary, pedestrian tastes of those rubes in middle America who revere Jesus and aren’t captivated by the “creative resistance” of the gay artistic vanguard. They demand “equality” and “inclusion” for the gay lobby, but there is no inclusion for the rest of us when it comes to what art they will declare advances the cause of “justice.” Curators ought to be wise enough to know there are limits of government-funded art.

So the curator announced finally that he was pulling the video of ants walking over the crucifix. But he offered no apology. In fact, he insisted that contrary to allegations, this “art” was not “meant to offend.” That’s simply dishonest. Anyone with an IQ greater than that of a potato chip knows this was precisely what they intended. This to them is the Christmas spirit.

Bozell Column: Shock Art and 'Social Dignity'

The truth is they are offended because people refuse to buy into the lust and decadence they want everyone else to accept, so they feel they have the right to mock the rest of the world and flaunt garbage and pornography as art and expect the average Joe to pay for it. Push back... just say no to the rape of America...

Yet we find elsewhere this story:

Boulder Atheists object to nativity scene at Denver court house

Local displays not on group's radar because they're not government-sponsored

By Brittany Anas Camera Staff Writer

Posted: 11/30/2010 06:33:14 PM MST

Read more: Boulder Atheists object to nativity scene at Denver court house - Boulder Daily Camera http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_16745198#ixzz179xidaG0
DailyCamera.com

Why aren't the atheist finding time to speak up against porn in the Smutsonian? Priorities?

Feeling safe, still ignoring the news..

It is amazing how ignoring the media makes me feel like I live in safer world. Is this how others deal with the world? just by ignoring it? I will do this for a few more days then I'll jump back into the muck of things, then maybe not.


For this post I was originally going to use a pencil drawing of a man with his head in the sand I found googling for such a picture. But when I saw the source of the picture, a blog which the blogger was defending Richard Dawkins and defending eugenics, while denying Richard Dawkins promotes eugenics and herself calling eugenics "Genetic engineering." In her own words:
 

The idea is once a couple (any couple) decides to breed, they can select which copies of their own genes can be used to form their child. This technology could be used to weed out genes that increase the likelihood of cancer, or arthritis, or hereditary brain disorders. But should it be used for aesthetic reasons like height, build, or eye-colour? Should it be used for general fitness or mental capacity or artistic creativity? Should there be limits to selecting gender?

Why can we not venture to ask the question?

This is a person, who herself has the inability to read and understand history, for these question have already been asked and the answers always lead to death. This poor soul has drawn her own self portrait with her blog punctuating it with the drawing of the man with his head in the sand. She not only ignores truth, but history and those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it.




Of course that is old news and I still refuse to venture today into what the media calls current news.