Abortionist Charged With Murder.

From  Kresta In The Afternoon: Abortionist Charged With Murdering Patient, Newbor...: "A Philadelphia physician, Kermit Barron Gosnell, was charged Wednesday with murder and other offenses for allegedly causing the death of one..."

But a grand jury investigation found that health and licensing officials had received repeated reports about Gosnell's dangerous practices for two decades, but no action was ever taken, even after the agencies learned that women had died during routine abortions under Gosnell's care, Williams said in a statement.

"What the [grand] jury found most troubling is that neither of those agencies took the time to investigate, to observe, to view, to go to the clinic itself since 1993," Williams said in comments during the news conference.

"I am aware that abortion is a hot-button topic," Williams said in a statement. "But as District Attorney, my job is to carry out the law. A doctor who knowingly and systematically mistreats female patients, to the point that one of them dies in his so-called care, commits murder under the law.

"A doctor who cuts into the necks severing the spinal cords of living, breathing babies, who would survive with proper medical attention, is committing murder under the law," Williams added.

You wonder why it took so long to stop this murderer? Was it because he was providing such a much needed service for the community?

Is he a useful idiot? or a greedy monster? Your choice.

Justice

Feeling safe, still ignoring the news..

It is amazing how ignoring the media makes me feel like I live in safer world. Is this how others deal with the world? just by ignoring it? I will do this for a few more days then I'll jump back into the muck of things, then maybe not.


For this post I was originally going to use a pencil drawing of a man with his head in the sand I found googling for such a picture. But when I saw the source of the picture, a blog which the blogger was defending Richard Dawkins and defending eugenics, while denying Richard Dawkins promotes eugenics and herself calling eugenics "Genetic engineering." In her own words:
 

The idea is once a couple (any couple) decides to breed, they can select which copies of their own genes can be used to form their child. This technology could be used to weed out genes that increase the likelihood of cancer, or arthritis, or hereditary brain disorders. But should it be used for aesthetic reasons like height, build, or eye-colour? Should it be used for general fitness or mental capacity or artistic creativity? Should there be limits to selecting gender?

Why can we not venture to ask the question?

This is a person, who herself has the inability to read and understand history, for these question have already been asked and the answers always lead to death. This poor soul has drawn her own self portrait with her blog punctuating it with the drawing of the man with his head in the sand. She not only ignores truth, but history and those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it.




Of course that is old news and I still refuse to venture today into what the media calls current news.