Juan Williams Fired By NPR?

Juan Williams Fired By NPR? Unbelievable. Yes I have been reading the news. More later,

-30-

Four richest men in the Senate

Senator John Kerry of Mass $525 Million, Senator Herb Kohl of Wisconsin $216 Million, Senator Mark Warner of VA $200 million and Senator Jay Rockefeller of WV $79 Million.

Feeling safe, still ignoring the news..

It is amazing how ignoring the media makes me feel like I live in safer world. Is this how others deal with the world? just by ignoring it? I will do this for a few more days then I'll jump back into the muck of things, then maybe not.


For this post I was originally going to use a pencil drawing of a man with his head in the sand I found googling for such a picture. But when I saw the source of the picture, a blog which the blogger was defending Richard Dawkins and defending eugenics, while denying Richard Dawkins promotes eugenics and herself calling eugenics "Genetic engineering." In her own words:
 

The idea is once a couple (any couple) decides to breed, they can select which copies of their own genes can be used to form their child. This technology could be used to weed out genes that increase the likelihood of cancer, or arthritis, or hereditary brain disorders. But should it be used for aesthetic reasons like height, build, or eye-colour? Should it be used for general fitness or mental capacity or artistic creativity? Should there be limits to selecting gender?

Why can we not venture to ask the question?

This is a person, who herself has the inability to read and understand history, for these question have already been asked and the answers always lead to death. This poor soul has drawn her own self portrait with her blog punctuating it with the drawing of the man with his head in the sand. She not only ignores truth, but history and those that ignore history are doomed to repeat it.




Of course that is old news and I still refuse to venture today into what the media calls current news.

Today is Thursday

Today is Thursday and I have ignored the news all week. I shall not fade away and I shall not die. I have shelter, food, a job, a car (really two, plus a motorcycle) and the world did not stop because I have not paid my dues to the liberal or even the non-liberal media.

Today is Thursday, one more day to work this week, two days off, and maybe on Sunday I will break down and buy the Sunday paper, if just to read the funnies.

Today is Thursday and I have ignored the news all week.

And feeling safer too, cool....

Columbus Day- a holiday I really like...

Many see Columbus as a villain but he was just a man of his time, in reality better than most. People tend to judge harshly historical figures by our current standards of understanding and knowledge, much bias with subjective agendas that usually are rooted in current political dogmas. Dogmas that is just as cruel and evil, if not even more so, then past actions of historical figures.

America was not a paradise for all before Columbus. And the Europeans were not the "cruelest" and "evilest" people on earth at the time. Each culture had and has their own evil, usually masked in its ignorance and unwillingness to embrace others. You add that ignorance, along with greed and selfishness you will find evil beyond imagination.

Myself, I feel no ill against Christopher Columbus, for I have this Middle Eastern Religious belief that God is in control and he will judge Columbus on judgment day for whatever personal sins he committed.

In my opinion those that paint Columbus as an evil man are in reality trying to paint all Europeans as evil and it is to push an alternate world view by continue promotion of the evil known as racism, by demonizing those they have judged in ignorance.

So what was America like pre-Columbian? Pretty bloody I would say. Yes, the Spaniards were cruel but the natives have their own demons and evils to answer for.

Today I came across this article  Religion - Latin America - Bibliography by Susan Elizabeth Ramirez of Toledo Ohio. I don't know her worldview, but I really like this short ? Bibliography ? I aim to find out more about her and her work.


Happy Columbus Day...

Random thought: who was or is the Ku Klux Klan?

Did some reading today and found out that the KKK was a Para-military terrorist organization serving the interests of the Democratic Party which desired restoration of white supremacy. Its purposes were to establish its (the Democratic Party’s?) power, seeking to control all of Southern society. It (the Democratic Party’s?) aimed to reverse the changes that raged across the South during Reconstruction. Destroying the Republican Party’s influence in the south pushing back reconstruction, reestablishing control of the black labor force, and restore racial subordination in every aspect of Southern life. To that end they worked to curb the education (in today’s world equivalent to opposing school choice), economic advancement (in today’s world equivalent to establishing a welfare class always dependent on government), voting rights (trying to establish one party rule, your vote only counts if you vote our way), and right to keep and bear arms of blacks (in today’s world equivalent to establishing gun control in all the large cities with major minority populations, such as Chicago, DC, NYC, Detroit and LA, just to name a few).

The Ku Klux Klan (the Democratic Party) soon spread into nearly every southern state, launching a "reign of terror against Republican leaders both black and white. Assassination victims during the campaign included Arkansas Congressman James Hinds, members of the South Carolina legislature, and others who served in constitutional conventions. This was back in the 19th centrury.

A random thought, I remember when a Republican Martin Luther King Junior was assassinated by a pro-Democratic racist, just a thought from the  20th centrury...

Another random thought, gee this happens a lot when you are old, the longest running member of the Senate was a Democrat of one of the poorest states In the Union. That is West Virginia’s Senator Robert Byrd, who started his political career as Klansman.

Bleeding random thoughts: I remember the first time I voted for a Republican for President. That was for Ronald Reagan the second time he ran.  I voted for him for he was pro life, but my grandfather an old die hard Democrat got really sore at me telling me that the Democrats were for the working man, and I shouldn’t abandon the working man’s party, funny that coming from a man that saw all of his son’s leave the state of Democrat controlled WV to find work.

Yep, I think Byrd, may God have mercy on his soul, was for the working man, he kept promising jobs to the working man, like a carrot on a stick, funny thing is many a man died waiting all those years with assurance and hope that Byrd would keep his promise. I wonder how many are still waiting. Myself I left WV 18 years ago.....

A history repeated, or a now and then narrative? Like I said before, I get a little confused.

Now you ask would a party that sprouted the KKK put a black man in the White House? Well that wouldn't be a proper question for it is obviously they did. The real question is why?

It may be fair to say they are reestablishing control of the black labor force, (Service Employees International Union) SEIU, and restoring racial subordination by and for the white liberal elites.

Still thinking...

The US government conducted medical experiments in the 1940s on prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala

The United States revealed on Friday that the government conducted medical experiments in the 1940s in which doctors infected soldiers, prisoners and mental patients in Guatemala with syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases. is how the story begins.



 Of course this reminds me of Tuskegee experiment,which I was exposed to in an American history class back in college. That experiment was one of the most notorious medical experiment in U.S. history; hundreds of African American men with late-stage syphilis were left untreated for a study of the disease that started in 1932. Those in power used trustworthy black doctors and a sweet nurse that saw the victims as her "boys".

 The practice of using influential African American and other minority leaders to control the masses by the white elite continues today. For example, Jessie Jackson selling out to gain favor and power from the liberal white elite by giving up his pro-life beliefs, fully embracing abortion despite the ill effect it has on the African-American community. This practice has been successful by negating the influences of free thinking minorities that have embraced individuality over race or class "loyalties" and labellings. In other words not staying in their proper place or designated roles. More on this another day.


This is just another example of academics and science gone amok. It is a sad history, but funny we still see it going on today. Yet our government and the elites of academia still fail to understand how to recognize it and take the right action. Despite revelations of past bad science, the elite just do not care or understand how their arrogance can destroy humanity more then it helps. For their wrong ideas must be validated,  the tickets stamped for that validation are new victims they find that are easier to exploit. Victims in which our country has stripped away their voice. This is most evident as we watch scientist battling for government funding for anti-life experiments on embryonic stem cells that are proven failures compared to adult stem cell research. Science is good, but it needs to be grounded in truth and ethics.

Where do embryonic stem cells come from? From the destruction of live embryos.

Where do these live embryos come come from? Well it really doesn't matter if you believe that life begins at conception. But of course embryonic stem cell proponents use language such as, "shortly after fertilization" instead of conception. Language is important in how it's used for it is a force in the control of the masses. This is what the works of George Orwell were really about, showing us how the use of language controls you and me. 

From the story I link at the beginning this post:

NIH Director Francis S. Collins condemned the experiment and said strict prohibitions are in place to prevent such abuses from happening today.
"This case of unethical human subject research represents an appalling example from a dark chapter in the history of medicine," Collins told reporters during a telephone briefing Friday.

Of course Collins fails to see any problem with embryonic stem cell research, or does he? This for sure is a failure of the current administration, the Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, as well as Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius or Susan M. Reverby, whose research prompt the U.S. government apology. They all appear to be concerned yet they all continue to endorse anti-life experiments in the name of science and "humanity". 


Human life? What is it? When does it begin? Who picks which human life is important? Is it deemed important by which race that life belongs? Or which life has a voice? If we cannot stand up for the most innocent, then what do we stand for?